Regional assessment of status and trends in PAH concentrations in sediment

  • Overview
  • Summary of individual time series results
  • Regional assessment - methods
  • Regional assessment - availability of time series
  • Regional trends
  • Regional status compared to the Effects Range Low (ERL)
  • Regional status compared to the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)
  • PAH profiles

Overview

The 2022 OSPAR CEMP assessment describes the status and trends of contaminant concentrations in biota and sediment at monitoring stations in the OSPAR area. Assessments are made for a large number of time series, each of a single contaminant in a single species and tissue (for biota) at a single monitoring station. This document is one of a series that synthesises the results of the individual time series to assess status and trends at the MIME regional level. In particular, it considers PAH concentrations in sediment, where the PAHs are NAP, ACNLE, ACNE, FLE, PA, ANT, DBT, FLU, PYR, BAA, CHR, BAP, BEP, BBKF, DBAHA, PER, BGHIP, ICDP. For simplicity, the term ‘region’ is used throughout to describe MIME regions. OSPAR regions are always referred to as such.

The regional status assessments presented in this document are integrated with regional status assessments for other contaminants and biological effects using the CHASE approach. Details can be found here.

The following sections:

  • summarise the individual time series results
  • describe the methods used to combine the individual time series results to estimate regional status and trends
  • present the estimates of regional trends
  • present the estimates of regional status


Summary of individual time series results

A time series of PAH concentrations is assessed for status if:

  • there is at least one year with data in the period 2015 to 2020
  • there are at least three years of data over the whole time series
  • a parametric model can be fitted to the data and used to estimate the mean concentration in the final monitoring year (or, occasionally, if a non-parametric test of status is applied)

The conditions are more stringent for trends. Specifically, a time series is assessed for trends if:

  • there is at least one year with data in the period 2015 to 2020
  • there are at least five years of data over the whole time series
  • a parametric model can be fitted to the data and used to estimate the trend in mean concentration

Note that all trend assessments for individual time series and most status assessments are based on the fit of a parametric model. This is important because only the parametric results are passed into the regional assessments in the following sections. 21 of the 2652 PAH time series were assessed for status using a non-parametric test.

The first tab below shows all the monitoring stations where there are individual time series assessments of trend or status for PAHs. The purple circles are stations where there is a trend assessment for at least one PAH, and the light blue cirles are stations where there are only status assessments.

The next set of tabs show the trend and status assessments for each PAH in turn. The colours have the following meaning:

  • blue: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)
  • green: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the Effects Range Low (ERL)
  • orange: there is no ERL and the mean concentration is not significantly below the BAC
  • red: the mean concentration is not signficantly below the ERL
  • black: there are no assessment criteria available

And the shapes have the following meaning:

  • downward triangle: the mean concentration is significantly decreasing (p < 0.05)
  • circle: there is no significant change in mean concentration (p > 0.05) or there are too few years to test for trends
  • upward triangle: the mean concentration is significantly increasing (p < 0.05)

The final set of tabs give:

  • the number of time series with upwards, downwards or no trend in each MIME and OSPAR region
  • the same information presented as proportions
  • the number of time series with blue, green, orange or red status in each MIME and OSPAR region
  • the same information presented as proportions

Note that only eleven of the PAHs have assessment criteria: NAP, PA, ANT, DBT, FLU, PYR, BAA, CHR, BAP, BGHIP, ICDP. Of these, DBT only has an ERL and BGHIP and ICDP only have a BAC. (NAP has an ERL and a BAC in all regions apart from the Iberian Sea and Gulf of Cadiz, where only the ERL applies.)


Stations


NAP


ACNLE


ACNE


FLE


PA


ANT


DBT


FLU


PYR


BAA


CHR


BAP


BEP


BBKF


DBAHA


PER


BGHIP


ICDP


Trend summary (numbers)

Number of time series with upwards, downwards or no trend by MIME and OSPAR region

OSPAR region MIME region status NAP ACNLE ACNE FLE PA ANT DBT FLU PYR BAA CHR BAP BEP BBKF DBAHA PER BGHIP ICDP total
2 Northern North Sea upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 8
no trend 13 7 13 13 17 13 12 15 15 14 15 13 13 14 15 14 13 15 244
downward trend 3 2 0 3 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 1 40
Southern North Sea upward trend 5 0 2 4 1 2 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 26
no trend 26 12 18 25 44 47 0 43 36 43 45 45 30 38 44 12 34 37 579
downward trend 3 1 5 5 9 3 0 11 14 10 8 9 4 4 5 2 18 15 126
Channel upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 2 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 2 3 45
downward trend 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 6
total upward trend 5 0 2 4 1 3 0 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 34
no trend 41 22 34 41 64 63 12 61 54 60 63 61 44 53 62 29 49 55 868
downward trend 7 3 5 8 10 5 2 13 17 12 11 12 9 9 7 4 22 16 172
3 Irish and Scottish West Coast upward trend 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 12
no trend 5 4 5 5 6 7 5 4 5 6 5 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 98
downward trend 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 8
Irish Sea upward trend 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4
no trend 10 6 12 10 14 12 5 12 10 13 12 13 11 10 12 8 13 12 195
downward trend 4 5 1 2 1 3 2 3 4 2 3 2 3 4 3 5 2 2 51
Celtic Sea upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16
downward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
total upward trend 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 16
no trend 16 11 18 16 21 20 10 17 16 20 17 20 18 17 18 15 20 19 309
downward trend 6 5 1 3 1 3 2 4 4 3 5 2 3 4 4 6 2 2 60


Trend summary (proportions)

Proportion of time series with upwards, downwards or no trend by MIME and OSPAR region

OSPAR region MIME region status NAP ACNLE ACNE FLE PA ANT DBT FLU PYR BAA CHR BAP BEP BBKF DBAHA PER BGHIP ICDP total
2 Northern North Sea upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 6 0 0 6 6 6 3
no trend 81 78 100 81 94 81 86 83 83 82 83 76 76 82 88 82 76 88 83
downward trend 19 22 0 19 6 13 14 11 17 12 17 18 18 18 12 12 18 6 14
Southern North Sea upward trend 15 0 8 12 2 4 3 4 2 2 0 0 5 2 7 0 4 4
no trend 76 92 72 73 81 90 77 69 80 83 83 88 86 88 80 65 68 79
downward trend 9 8 20 15 17 6 20 27 18 15 17 12 9 10 13 35 28 17
Channel upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 67 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 33 33 100 100 67 100 88
downward trend 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 67 0 0 33 0 12
total upward trend 10 0 5 8 2 4 0 4 3 3 1 1 2 3 1 6 1 4 3
no trend 77 88 83 77 85 89 86 79 74 81 84 83 81 83 89 83 68 74 81
downward trend 13 12 12 15 13 7 14 17 23 16 15 16 17 14 10 11 31 22 16
3 Irish and Scottish West Coast upward trend 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 29 29 0 14 14 14 14 14 0 14 14 10
no trend 71 100 100 83 86 100 100 57 71 86 72 86 86 86 72 86 86 86 83
downward trend 29 0 0 17 0 0 0 14 0 14 14 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 7
Irish Sea upward trend 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 2
no trend 66 55 92 83 93 80 71 80 66 87 80 87 73 71 80 62 87 80 78
downward trend 27 45 8 17 7 20 29 20 27 13 20 13 20 29 20 38 13 13 20
Celtic Sea upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 94
downward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
total upward trend 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 9 13 0 4 4 9 5 4 0 4 9 4
no trend 70 69 95 84 91 87 83 74 70 87 74 87 78 77 78 71 87 82 80
downward trend 26 31 5 16 4 13 17 17 17 13 22 9 13 18 18 29 9 9 16


Status summary (numbers)

Number of time series with each status by MIME and OSPAR region

OSPAR region MIME region status NAP PA ANT DBT FLU PYR BAA CHR BAP BGHIP ICDP total
2 Northern North Sea blue 9 8 8 0 7 6 6 6 7 7 7 71
green 4 6 7 17 10 12 10 12 10 0 0 88
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 20
red 5 4 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 14
Southern North Sea blue 0 4 3 0 3 3 4 3 11 38 45 114
green 32 51 55 5 57 55 55 57 48 0 0 415
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 16 38
red 7 6 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 19
Channel blue 1 2 0 0 5 2 1 2 4 12 19 48
green 22 33 24 4 37 40 35 42 41 0 0 278
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 32 71
red 10 17 22 0 10 10 16 8 7 0 0 100
total blue 10 14 11 0 15 11 11 11 22 57 71 233
green 58 90 86 26 104 107 100 111 99 0 0 781
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 58 129
red 22 27 27 0 12 10 18 9 8 0 0 133
3 Irish and Scottish West Coast blue 1 3 4 0 4 4 3 2 3 5 6 35
green 6 4 3 5 3 3 3 5 4 0 0 36
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3
red 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Irish Sea blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 5
green 14 11 13 10 13 13 12 12 13 0 0 111
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 25
red 1 4 2 0 2 2 3 3 2 0 0 19
Celtic Sea blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3
green 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 0 0 20
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4
red 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
total blue 1 3 4 0 4 4 3 2 4 8 10 43
green 22 17 17 16 19 19 18 20 19 0 0 167
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 15 32
red 1 5 2 0 2 2 4 3 2 0 0 21
4 Iberian Sea blue 0 4 3 0 6 7 4 9 11 9 8 61
green 0 21 19 0 22 23 20 19 19 0 0 143
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 50
red 0 9 10 0 6 4 9 6 4 0 0 48
total blue 0 4 3 0 6 7 4 9 11 9 8 61
green 0 21 19 0 22 23 20 19 19 0 0 143
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 50
red 0 9 10 0 6 4 9 6 4 0 0 48


Status summary (proportions)

Proportion of time series with each status by MIME and OSPAR region

OSPAR region MIME region status NAP PA ANT DBT FLU PYR BAA CHR BAP BGHIP ICDP total
2 Northern North Sea blue 50 45 44 0 39 33 35 33 41 41 41 37
green 22 33 39 100 55 67 59 67 59 0 0 46
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 59 10
red 28 22 17 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 7
Southern North Sea blue 0 6 5 0 5 5 7 5 18 63 74 19
green 82 84 92 100 93 95 91 93 80 0 0 71
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 26 7
red 18 10 3 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 3
Channel blue 3 4 0 0 10 4 2 4 8 24 37 10
green 67 63 52 100 71 77 67 81 79 0 0 56
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 63 14
red 30 33 48 0 19 19 31 15 13 0 0 20
total blue 11 11 9 0 12 8 9 8 17 45 55 18
green 65 69 69 100 79 84 77 85 77 0 0 61
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 45 10
red 24 20 22 0 9 8 14 7 6 0 0 11
3 Irish and Scottish West Coast blue 14 43 57 0 57 57 43 29 43 71 86 47
green 86 57 43 100 43 43 43 71 57 0 0 48
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 14 4
red 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1
Irish Sea blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 20 3
green 93 73 87 100 87 87 80 80 87 0 0 69
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 80 16
red 7 27 13 0 13 13 20 20 13 0 0 12
Celtic Sea blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 33 33 11
green 100 67 100 100 100 100 100 100 67 0 0 71
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 67 14
red 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
total blue 4 12 17 0 16 16 12 8 16 32 40 16
green 92 68 74 100 76 76 72 80 76 0 0 64
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 60 12
red 4 20 9 0 8 8 16 12 8 0 0 8
4 Iberian Sea blue 12 9 17 20 12 26 32 26 24 20
green 62 60 65 68 61 56 56 0 0 47
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 76 17
red 26 31 18 12 27 18 12 0 0 16
total blue 12 9 17 20 12 26 32 26 24 20
green 62 60 65 68 61 56 56 0 0 47
orange 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 76 17
red 26 31 18 12 27 18 12 0 0 16


Regional assessment - methods

Tabulating the number of time series with each status category by region provides a quick summary of the individual time series results. However, it does not provide an objective regional assessment of status. Similarly, tabulating the number of time series with an upward or downward trend does not provide an objective regional assessment of trend. This section describes how the individual time series results can by synthesised in a meta-analysis to assess both status and trend at the regional level.

Trends

For a regional trend assessment, the trend in each time series is summarised by the estimated change in log concentration over the last twenty years (or shorter if the time series doesn’t extend that far back). Regional trends are then estimated by fitting the following linear mixed model by restricted maximum likelihood:

  • response: trend (yearly change in log concentration)
  • fixed model: region
  • random model: PAH + region.PAH + station + trend estimation variation + residual variation

The fixed model means that a trend is estimated for each region. Trends in the different PAHs are assumed to be broadly similar, because inputs and control measures are likely to affect all PAHs in a similar way. Each regional trend can thus be interpreted as the common trend in PAH concentrations in that region (i.e. the trend averaged across all PAHs).

The random model has five terms:

  • PAH allows for variation in trend between PAHs common to all regions
  • region.PAH allows for additional variation in trend between PAHs within regions
  • station allows for variation in trend between stations common to all PAHs
  • trend estimation variation is the variance of the trend estimates from the individual time series analysis, assumed known and fixed
  • residual variation is the variation that cannot be explained by any of the fixed effects or the other random effects

The meta-analysis is restricted to time series from monitoring stations that are classified as ‘representative’ or ‘baseline’ (near pristine conditions or only subject to very diffuse inputs). ‘Impacted’ stations (those close to a point source) are omitted because trends there will likely reflect changes due to the point source and will be ‘unrepresentative’ at the regional level.

The meta-analysis is further restricted to:

  • regions with at least three trend stations with good geographic spread. Three stations is considered the minimum required to provide some sort of evidence base at the regional level
  • PAHs with trend information for at least three stations (over all regions): PAHs are treated as random effects in the meta-anlaysis, so information about trends in one PAH can be ‘borrowed’ from the trend information in the other PAHs

Status

For a regional status assessment, the status of each time series is summarised by the difference between the estimated mean log concentration in the final monitoring year and the log assessment concentration. This ensures that status is always measured on the same scale, even though the assessment concentration might vary between PAHs and regions. Essentially the same linear mixed model as for trends is then fitted:

  • response: status (mean log concentration - log assessment concentration)
  • fixed model: region
  • random model: PAH + region.PAH + station + status estimation variation + residual variation

where status estimation variation is the variation in the status estimates from the individual time series analysis, assumed known and fixed.

There are no restrictions on the time series used in the status meta-analysis based on the classification of the monitoring station; time series from baseline, representative and impacted stations are all included. However, the few time series with a non-parametric assessment of status must be excluded, because there is no summary measure of status to use in the mixed model.

Again, the meta-analysis is restricted to regions with at least three status stations with good geographic spread and to PAHs with status information for at least three stations (over all regions).

Presentation

The results of both the trend and status regional assessments are back-transformed for presentation. The estimated regional trend is then interpreted as the percentage yearly change in concentration and the estimated regional status as the ratio of the mean regional concentration to the assessment concentration. To illustrate the latter, a value of 1 indicates that the mean regional concentration is equal to the assessment concentration; a value of 0.5 indicates that it is half the assessment concentration, and a value of 2 indicates that it is twice the assessment concentration.


Regional assessment - availability of time series

This section provides more detail on the number and geographic spread of the time series available for the meta-analyses. The tabs show the stations with parametric trend and status assessments for each OSPAR region in turn, having excluded trend assessments at baseline and impacted stations. The purple circles are stations where there is a trend assessment for at least one PAH, and the light blue cirles are stations where there are only status assessments.

The following regions have an insufficient number or time series or spread of stations and are excluded from the regional assessment:

  • trend: Celtic Sea
  • status: Celtic Sea


OSPAR region 1


OSPAR region 2


OSPAR region 3


OSPAR region 4


Regional trends

The first 4 tabs show:

  • Regional trends: estimates of the regional trend (averaged over PAHs) with pointwise 95% confidence intervals
  • Regional trends by PAH: regional trend estimates for each PAH with pointwise 95% confidence intervals plotted by PAH
  • Regional trends by region: regional trend estimates for each PAH with pointwise 95% confidence intervals plotted by region
  • Individual time series: the trend estimates from the individual time series on which the regional assessment is based. The estimates for regions with insufficient geographic spread (and excluded from the meta-analysis) are also shown.

The symbols in all these plots have the following interpretation:

  • downward triangle: the mean concentration is significantly decreasing (p < 0.05)
  • circle: there is no significant change in mean concentration (p > 0.05)
  • upward triangle: the mean concentration is significantly increasing (p < 0.05)

The final 2 tabs show the estimates of the regional trend (averaged over PAHs) and the regional trend by PAH


Regional trends


Regional trends by PAH


Regional trends by region


Individual time series


Estimates by region

This table shows the estimates of the regional trend:

  • trend: the estimated mean yearly change in log concentration across the region (multiplied by 100 for presentation)
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • lower, upper: the corresponding pointwise 95% confidence limits
  • % yearly change: the estimated mean % yearly change in concentration across the region
  • %yc lower, %yc upper: the corresponding pointwise 95% confidence limits


MIME region trend se lower upper % yearly change %yc lower %yc upper
Northern North Sea -0.87 0.83 -2.49 0.76 -0.86 -2.46 0.76
Southern North Sea -0.89 0.48 -1.84 0.05 -0.89 -1.82 0.05
Channel -2.94 1.94 -6.74 0.87 -2.89 -6.52 0.87
Irish and Scottish West Coast 2.67 1.30 0.12 5.21 2.70 0.12 5.35
Irish Sea -0.66 0.96 -2.53 1.21 -0.66 -2.50 1.22


Estimates by region and PAH

This table shows the estimates of the regional trend by determinand:

  • trend: the estimated mean yearly change in log concentration across the region (multiplied by 100 for presentation)
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • lower, upper: the corresponding pointwise 95% confidence limits
  • % yearly change: the estimated mean % yearly change in concentration across the region
  • %yc lower, %yc upper: the corresponding pointwise 95% confidence limits


MIME region PAH trend se lower upper % yearly change %yc lower %yc upper
Northern North Sea NAP -1.60 0.94 -3.43 0.24 -1.59 -3.38 0.24
ACNLE -1.25 1.03 -3.28 0.78 -1.24 -3.22 0.78
ACNE -0.61 0.95 -2.47 1.26 -0.61 -2.44 1.27
FLE -1.04 0.91 -2.81 0.74 -1.03 -2.77 0.74
PA -0.84 0.89 -2.58 0.90 -0.84 -2.54 0.90
ANT -0.98 0.93 -2.81 0.85 -0.97 -2.77 0.86
DBT -0.91 0.94 -2.76 0.94 -0.90 -2.72 0.95
FLU -0.81 0.89 -2.56 0.94 -0.80 -2.52 0.95
PYR -0.82 0.89 -2.58 0.93 -0.82 -2.54 0.93
BAA -0.67 0.91 -2.46 1.11 -0.67 -2.43 1.12
CHR -1.17 0.91 -2.96 0.61 -1.17 -2.92 0.61
BAP -0.90 0.90 -2.66 0.86 -0.89 -2.62 0.87
BEP -0.29 0.89 -2.04 1.47 -0.29 -2.02 1.48
BBKF -1.56 0.91 -3.34 0.22 -1.55 -3.28 0.22
DBAHA -0.94 0.94 -2.78 0.91 -0.93 -2.74 0.91
PER -0.80 0.94 -2.64 1.04 -0.79 -2.60 1.05
BGHIP -0.53 0.91 -2.31 1.25 -0.53 -2.28 1.25
ICDP 0.11 0.91 -1.68 1.90 0.11 -1.67 1.92
Southern North Sea NAP 0.59 0.54 -0.46 1.64 0.60 -0.45 1.66
ACNLE -0.36 0.75 -1.83 1.11 -0.36 -1.82 1.12
ACNE -1.68 0.59 -2.84 -0.52 -1.66 -2.80 -0.51
FLE 0.03 0.56 -1.06 1.12 0.03 -1.06 1.13
PA -0.71 0.48 -1.65 0.23 -0.71 -1.64 0.23
ANT -0.24 0.49 -1.21 0.72 -0.24 -1.20 0.72
FLU -1.14 0.48 -2.07 -0.21 -1.14 -2.05 -0.21
PYR -1.41 0.48 -2.34 -0.48 -1.40 -2.32 -0.48
BAA -1.20 0.48 -2.13 -0.26 -1.19 -2.11 -0.26
CHR -0.97 0.48 -1.91 -0.03 -0.96 -1.89 -0.03
BAP -1.17 0.48 -2.12 -0.23 -1.17 -2.10 -0.23
BEP -0.84 0.49 -1.79 0.11 -0.84 -1.78 0.11
BBKF -1.06 0.48 -2.01 -0.11 -1.05 -1.99 -0.11
DBAHA -0.79 0.50 -1.78 0.20 -0.79 -1.76 0.20
PER -1.16 0.68 -2.50 0.18 -1.15 -2.46 0.18
BGHIP -1.51 0.47 -2.44 -0.59 -1.50 -2.41 -0.59
ICDP -1.61 0.48 -2.55 -0.68 -1.60 -2.52 -0.67
Channel NAP -2.97 2.03 -6.95 1.02 -2.92 -6.72 1.03
ACNLE -2.60 2.05 -6.62 1.41 -2.57 -6.40 1.42
ACNE -2.73 2.04 -6.74 1.27 -2.69 -6.51 1.28
FLE -2.80 2.04 -6.79 1.19 -2.76 -6.56 1.20
PA -2.85 2.02 -6.82 1.12 -2.81 -6.59 1.13
ANT -2.93 2.03 -6.91 1.06 -2.88 -6.68 1.06
FLU -2.88 2.04 -6.87 1.12 -2.84 -6.64 1.12
PYR -3.06 2.03 -7.04 0.91 -3.02 -6.80 0.92
BAA -2.93 2.05 -6.94 1.08 -2.89 -6.70 1.08
CHR -3.03 2.05 -7.04 0.98 -2.98 -6.80 0.99
BAP -3.04 2.03 -7.02 0.93 -3.00 -6.77 0.93
BEP -3.41 2.02 -7.37 0.54 -3.36 -7.10 0.54
BBKF -3.44 2.02 -7.40 0.52 -3.38 -7.13 0.53
DBAHA -2.79 2.03 -6.77 1.20 -2.75 -6.55 1.21
PER -3.13 2.02 -7.09 0.82 -3.08 -6.84 0.83
BGHIP -2.76 2.02 -6.72 1.20 -2.72 -6.50 1.20
ICDP -2.59 2.03 -6.57 1.38 -2.56 -6.36 1.39
Irish and Scottish West Coast NAP 2.02 1.40 -0.72 4.77 2.05 -0.72 4.88
ACNLE 2.57 1.45 -0.28 5.42 2.60 -0.28 5.57
ACNE 2.61 1.42 -0.18 5.40 2.64 -0.18 5.55
FLE 2.64 1.39 -0.09 5.37 2.67 -0.09 5.51
PA 2.95 1.39 0.23 5.66 2.99 0.23 5.83
ANT 2.95 1.40 0.21 5.70 3.00 0.21 5.86
DBT 3.02 1.39 0.30 5.74 3.07 0.30 5.91
FLU 2.49 1.38 -0.22 5.19 2.52 -0.22 5.33
PYR 2.75 1.39 0.03 5.46 2.78 0.03 5.62
BAA 2.37 1.40 -0.37 5.10 2.40 -0.37 5.24
CHR 2.79 1.38 0.08 5.51 2.83 0.08 5.66
BAP 2.76 1.38 0.05 5.47 2.80 0.05 5.62
BEP 3.49 1.39 0.77 6.21 3.55 0.77 6.40
BBKF 2.33 1.37 -0.37 5.02 2.35 -0.37 5.15
DBAHA 2.41 1.37 -0.29 5.10 2.44 -0.28 5.24
PER 2.18 1.38 -0.53 4.89 2.20 -0.53 5.01
BGHIP 2.85 1.38 0.15 5.56 2.89 0.15 5.71
ICDP 2.83 1.38 0.13 5.53 2.87 0.13 5.69
Irish Sea NAP -0.13 1.02 -2.12 1.86 -0.13 -2.10 1.88
ACNLE -0.64 1.07 -2.74 1.46 -0.64 -2.70 1.47
ACNE -0.39 1.06 -2.46 1.69 -0.39 -2.43 1.71
FLE -0.53 1.03 -2.55 1.49 -0.53 -2.52 1.50
PA 0.10 1.02 -1.90 2.11 0.10 -1.89 2.13
ANT -1.02 1.04 -3.05 1.01 -1.01 -3.01 1.02
DBT -0.58 1.06 -2.66 1.50 -0.58 -2.63 1.51
FLU -0.42 1.01 -2.41 1.56 -0.42 -2.38 1.57
PYR -0.32 1.01 -2.30 1.66 -0.32 -2.27 1.67
BAA -0.73 1.02 -2.73 1.27 -0.73 -2.69 1.28
CHR -0.48 1.03 -2.50 1.54 -0.48 -2.47 1.55
BAP -0.31 1.03 -2.32 1.70 -0.31 -2.30 1.71
BEP -0.61 1.02 -2.61 1.39 -0.60 -2.57 1.40
BBKF -1.46 1.03 -3.47 0.55 -1.45 -3.41 0.55
DBAHA -1.16 1.03 -3.17 0.85 -1.15 -3.12 0.85
PER -2.84 1.02 -4.85 -0.84 -2.80 -4.74 -0.83
BGHIP -0.29 1.02 -2.28 1.71 -0.29 -2.26 1.72
ICDP -0.11 1.02 -2.10 1.88 -0.11 -2.08 1.90


Regional status compared to the Effects Range Low (ERL)

The first 4 tabs show:

  • Regional status: estimates of the regional status (averaged over PAHs) with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals
  • Regional status by PAH: regional status estimates for each PAH with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals plotted by PAH
  • Regional status by region: regional status estimates for each PAH with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals plotted by region
  • Individual time series: the status estimates from the individual time series on which the regional assessment is based. The estimates for regions with insufficient geographic spread (and excluded from the meta-analysis) are also shown.

The symbols in all the plots have the following interpretation:

  • blue: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)
  • green: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the ERL
  • red: the mean concentration is not significantly below the ERL

Note that to see why some points might be coloured blue, it is necessary to look ahead to the next section, where status is compared to the BAC. Unfortunately, it isn’t easy to present the assessment of status relative to the ERL with the assessment of status relative to the BAC because the ratio of the BAC to the ERL can vary between PAHs and regions.

The final 2 tabs show the estimates of the regional status (averaged over PAHs) and the regional status trend by PAH


Regional status


Regional status by PAH


Regional status by region


Individual time series


Estimates by region

This table shows the estimates of the regional status:

  • status: the estimated mean log concentration minus the log ERL
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit
  • concentration: the estimated mean concentration relative to the ERL
  • conc upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit


MIME region status se upper concentration conc upper
Northern North Sea -2.96 0.34 -2.40 0.05 0.09
Southern North Sea -2.24 0.25 -1.83 0.11 0.16
Channel -2.37 0.25 -1.95 0.09 0.14
Irish and Scottish West Coast -2.94 0.48 -2.15 0.05 0.12
Irish Sea -1.64 0.36 -1.05 0.19 0.35
Iberian Sea -2.72 0.28 -2.25 0.07 0.11


Estimates by region and PAH

This table shows the estimates of the regional trend by determinand:

  • status: the estimated mean log concentration minus the log ERL
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit
  • concentration: the estimated mean concentration relative to the ERL
  • conc upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit


MIME region PAH status se upper concentration conc upper
Northern North Sea NAP -2.97 0.28 -2.50 0.05 0.08
PA -2.19 0.28 -1.72 0.11 0.18
ANT -2.85 0.29 -2.38 0.06 0.09
DBT -4.33 0.28 -3.87 0.01 0.02
FLU -2.84 0.28 -2.38 0.06 0.09
PYR -3.09 0.28 -2.63 0.05 0.07
BAA -2.65 0.28 -2.18 0.07 0.11
CHR -2.83 0.28 -2.37 0.06 0.09
BAP -2.88 0.28 -2.41 0.06 0.09
BGHIP
ICDP
Southern North Sea NAP -1.59 0.16 -1.33 0.20 0.26
PA -1.54 0.15 -1.29 0.21 0.28
ANT -1.92 0.15 -1.66 0.15 0.19
DBT -3.36 0.18 -3.06 0.03 0.05
FLU -2.17 0.15 -1.92 0.11 0.15
PYR -2.57 0.15 -2.31 0.08 0.10
BAA -2.15 0.15 -1.90 0.12 0.15
CHR -2.36 0.15 -2.11 0.09 0.12
BAP -2.52 0.15 -2.26 0.08 0.10
BGHIP
ICDP
Channel NAP -2.95 0.18 -2.66 0.05 0.07
PA -1.74 0.17 -1.46 0.18 0.23
ANT -1.90 0.17 -1.62 0.15 0.20
DBT -3.87 0.20 -3.54 0.02 0.03
FLU -2.15 0.17 -1.88 0.12 0.15
PYR -2.49 0.17 -2.21 0.08 0.11
BAA -1.86 0.17 -1.58 0.16 0.21
CHR -2.20 0.17 -1.93 0.11 0.15
BAP -2.14 0.17 -1.87 0.12 0.15
BGHIP
ICDP
Irish and Scottish West Coast NAP -2.76 0.45 -2.02 0.06 0.13
PA -2.05 0.45 -1.31 0.13 0.27
ANT -3.07 0.45 -2.33 0.05 0.10
DBT -3.95 0.45 -3.21 0.02 0.04
FLU -2.94 0.45 -2.20 0.05 0.11
PYR -3.26 0.45 -2.52 0.04 0.08
BAA -2.84 0.45 -2.10 0.06 0.12
CHR -2.77 0.45 -2.03 0.06 0.13
BAP -2.86 0.45 -2.11 0.06 0.12
BGHIP
ICDP
Irish Sea NAP -1.45 0.31 -0.95 0.23 0.39
PA -0.81 0.31 -0.31 0.44 0.74
ANT -1.58 0.31 -1.07 0.21 0.34
DBT -3.00 0.31 -2.50 0.05 0.08
FLU -1.55 0.31 -1.05 0.21 0.35
PYR -1.78 0.31 -1.28 0.17 0.28
BAA -1.37 0.31 -0.87 0.25 0.42
CHR -1.57 0.31 -1.07 0.21 0.34
BAP -1.63 0.31 -1.13 0.20 0.32
BGHIP
ICDP
Iberian Sea PA -1.92 0.20 -1.59 0.15 0.20
ANT -2.20 0.20 -1.86 0.11 0.16
FLU -2.53 0.20 -2.20 0.08 0.11
PYR -2.93 0.20 -2.60 0.05 0.07
BAA -2.40 0.20 -2.07 0.09 0.13
CHR -2.96 0.21 -2.62 0.05 0.07
BAP -2.94 0.20 -2.61 0.05 0.07
BGHIP
ICDP


Regional status compared to the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)

The first 4 tabs show:

  • Regional status: estimates of the regional status (averaged over PAHs) with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals
  • Regional status by PAH: regional status estimates for each PAH with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals plotted by PAH
  • Regional status by region: regional status estimates for each PAH with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals plotted by region
  • Individual time series: the status estimates from the individual time series on which the regional assessment is based. The estimates for regions with insufficient geographic spread (and excluded from the meta-analysis) are also shown.

The symbols in all the plots have the following interpretation:

  • blue: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the BAC
  • green: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the Effects Range Low (ERL)
  • orange: there is no ERL and the mean concentration is not significantly below the BAC
  • red: the mean concentration is not significantly below the ERL

The final 2 tabs show the estimates of the regional status (averaged over PAHs) and the regional status trend by PAH


Regional status


Regional status by PAH


Regional status by region


Individual time series


Estimates by region

This table shows the estimates of the regional status:

  • status: the estimated mean log concentration minus the log BAC
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit
  • concentration: the estimated mean concentration relative to the BAC
  • conc upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit


MIME region status se upper concentration conc upper
Northern North Sea -0.07 0.30 0.43 0.93 1.53
Southern North Sea 0.42 0.21 0.76 1.52 2.14
Channel 0.37 0.22 0.72 1.45 2.06
Irish and Scottish West Coast -0.17 0.45 0.57 0.85 1.77
Irish Sea 1.06 0.33 1.60 2.89 4.95
Iberian Sea 1.23 0.25 1.63 3.43 5.13


Estimates by region and PAH

This table shows the estimates of the regional trend by determinand:

  • status: the estimated mean log concentration minus the log BAC
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit
  • concentration: the estimated mean concentration relative to the BAC
  • conc upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit


MIME region PAH status se upper concentration conc upper
Northern North Sea NAP 0.06 0.28 0.52 1.06 1.68
PA -0.13 0.27 0.33 0.88 1.38
ANT 0.03 0.28 0.49 1.03 1.63
DBT
FLU -0.07 0.28 0.38 0.93 1.46
PYR 0.27 0.27 0.72 1.30 2.05
BAA 0.19 0.28 0.64 1.21 1.90
CHR 0.16 0.28 0.62 1.18 1.85
BAP -0.16 0.28 0.29 0.85 1.34
BGHIP -0.51 0.28 -0.06 0.60 0.94
ICDP -0.57 0.28 -0.12 0.57 0.89
Southern North Sea NAP 1.45 0.15 1.70 4.27 5.49
PA 0.48 0.15 0.73 1.62 2.07
ANT 0.93 0.15 1.18 2.54 3.24
DBT
FLU 0.56 0.15 0.81 1.76 2.24
PYR 0.76 0.15 1.00 2.13 2.72
BAA 0.64 0.15 0.89 1.90 2.43
CHR 0.60 0.15 0.84 1.82 2.32
BAP 0.16 0.15 0.40 1.17 1.49
BGHIP -0.59 0.15 -0.35 0.55 0.71
ICDP -0.79 0.15 -0.55 0.45 0.58
Channel NAP -0.01 0.17 0.27 0.99 1.31
PA 0.27 0.16 0.54 1.32 1.72
ANT 0.94 0.17 1.21 2.56 3.36
DBT
FLU 0.58 0.16 0.85 1.78 2.33
PYR 0.82 0.16 1.09 2.28 2.98
BAA 0.93 0.16 1.20 2.54 3.32
CHR 0.75 0.16 1.01 2.11 2.76
BAP 0.52 0.16 0.79 1.68 2.20
BGHIP -0.51 0.16 -0.24 0.60 0.79
ICDP -0.60 0.16 -0.34 0.55 0.71
Irish and Scottish West Coast NAP 0.18 0.44 0.90 1.19 2.46
PA -0.07 0.44 0.66 0.94 1.93
ANT -0.33 0.44 0.40 0.72 1.49
DBT
FLU -0.26 0.44 0.47 0.77 1.59
PYR 0.01 0.44 0.73 1.01 2.08
BAA -0.11 0.44 0.62 0.90 1.85
CHR 0.18 0.44 0.90 1.19 2.45
BAP -0.22 0.44 0.50 0.81 1.66
BGHIP -0.46 0.44 0.26 0.63 1.29
ICDP -0.61 0.44 0.11 0.55 1.12
Irish Sea NAP 1.52 0.30 2.02 4.59 7.51
PA 1.18 0.30 1.67 3.25 5.31
ANT 1.23 0.30 1.72 3.42 5.59
DBT
FLU 1.16 0.30 1.65 3.18 5.19
PYR 1.52 0.30 2.01 4.57 7.45
BAA 1.38 0.30 1.87 3.98 6.50
CHR 1.34 0.30 1.83 3.81 6.22
BAP 1.02 0.30 1.51 2.77 4.52
BGHIP 0.22 0.30 0.71 1.24 2.02
ICDP 0.07 0.30 0.56 1.07 1.75
Iberian Sea PA 1.58 0.20 1.91 4.85 6.72
ANT 1.67 0.20 2.00 5.31 7.37
FLU 1.20 0.20 1.53 3.32 4.60
PYR 1.15 0.20 1.48 3.16 4.37
BAA 1.21 0.20 1.54 3.37 4.67
CHR 0.88 0.20 1.21 2.41 3.37
BAP 1.01 0.20 1.34 2.76 3.81
BGHIP 1.06 0.20 1.38 2.89 3.99
ICDP 1.03 0.20 1.36 2.81 3.89


PAH profiles

The profile of concentrations across PAHs can sometimes be useful for examining sources, and for comparing concentrations across regions where assessment criteria are not available. Profiles were examined by fitting the following linear mixed model by restricted maximum likelihood:

  • response: mean log concentration
  • fixed model: region
  • random model: PAH + region.PAH + station + estimation variation + residual variation

where, for each time series, the mean log concentration is the estimated mean log concentration in the final monitoring year and the estimation variance is the variance associated with this estimate.

The estimated PAH concentration profiles by region are shown below with pointwise 95% confidence limits. The units are ug/kg dw normalised to 2.5% organic carbon (apart from in the Iberian Sea where they are non-normalised).