Regional assessment of status and trends in PCB concentrations in sediment

  • Overview
  • Summary of individual time series results
  • Regional assessment - methods
  • Regional assessment - availability of time series
  • Regional trends
  • Regional status compared to the Environmental Assessment Criterion (EAC)
  • Regional status compared to the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)
  • PCB profiles

Overview

The 2024 OSPAR CEMP assessment describes the status and trends of contaminant concentrations in biota and sediment at monitoring stations in the OSPAR area. Assessments are made for a large number of time series, each of a single contaminant in a single species and tissue (for biota) or matrix (for sediment) at a single monitoring station. This document is one of a series that synthesises the results of the individual time series to assess status and trends at the MIME regional level. In particular, it considers PCB concentrations in sediment, where the PCBs are CB28, CB52, CB101, CB118, CB138, CB153, CB180. For simplicity, the term ‘region’ is used throughout to describe MIME regions. OSPAR regions are always referred to as such.

The regional status assessments presented in this document are integrated with regional status assessments for other contaminants and biological effects using the CHASE approach. Details can be found here.

The following sections:

  • summarise the individual time series results
  • describe the methods used to combine the individual time series results to estimate regional status and trends
  • present the estimates of regional trends
  • present the estimates of regional status


Summary of individual time series results

A time series of PCB concentrations is assessed for status if:

  • there is at least one year with data in the period 2017 to 2022
  • there are at least three years of data over the whole time series
  • a parametric model can be fitted to the data and used to estimate the mean concentration in the final monitoring year (or, occasionally, if a non-parametric test of status is applied)

The conditions are more stringent for trends. Specifically, a time series is assessed for trends if:

  • there is at least one year with data in the period 2017 to 2022
  • there are at least five years of data over the whole time series
  • a parametric model can be fitted to the data and used to estimate the trend in mean concentration

Note that all trend assessments for individual time series and most status assessments are based on the fit of a parametric model. This is important because only the parametric results are passed into the regional assessments in the following sections. 86 of the 1245 PCB time series were assessed for status using a non-parametric test.

Note also that time series from the Iberian Coast are included even though the last data year is 2016. This is for continuity: samples were collected in 2022 but have yet to be analysed and reported.

The first tab below shows all the monitoring stations where there are individual time series assessments of trend or status for PCBs. The purple circles are stations where there is a trend assessment for at least one PCB, and the light blue cirles are stations where there are only status assessments.

The next set of tabs show the trend and status assessments for each PCB in turn. The colours have the following meaning:

  • blue: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)
  • green: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the Environmental Assessment Criterion (EAC)
  • red: the mean concentration is not signficantly below the EAC

And the shapes have the following meaning:

  • downward triangle: the mean concentration is significantly decreasing (p < 0.05)
  • circle: there is no significant change in mean concentration (p > 0.05) or there are too few years to test for trends
  • upward triangle: the mean concentration is significantly increasing (p < 0.05)

The final set of tabs give:

  • the number of time series with upwards, downwards or no trend in each MIME and OSPAR region
  • the same information presented as proportions
  • the number of time series with blue, green or red status in each MIME and OSPAR region
  • the same information presented as proportions

Note that there are no BACs for the Iberian Coast and Gulf of Cadiz. Time series in these regions are only assessed against the EAC.


Stations


CB28


CB52


CB101


CB118


CB138


CB153


CB180


Trend summary (numbers)

Number of time series with upwards, downwards or no trend by MIME and OSPAR region

OSPAR region MIME region status CB28 CB52 CB101 CB118 CB138 CB153 CB180 total
2 Northern North Sea upward trend 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
no trend 4 9 10 9 10 9 7 58
downward trend 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 12
Southern North Sea upward trend 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
no trend 19 17 23 19 17 21 14 130
downward trend 22 19 20 25 28 24 24 162
Channel upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 4
downward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
total upward trend 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3
no trend 23 27 34 29 27 31 21 192
downward trend 24 20 21 26 30 26 27 174
3 Irish and Scottish West Coast upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 3 3 3 3 5 6 3 26
downward trend 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Irish Sea upward trend 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3
no trend 8 7 6 7 7 9 9 53
downward trend 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 5
total upward trend 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3
no trend 11 10 9 10 12 15 12 79
downward trend 1 0 2 1 2 1 0 7
4 Gulf of Cadiz upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 6 7 9 8 9 8 9 56
downward trend 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
total upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 6 7 9 8 9 8 9 56
downward trend 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1


Trend summary (proportions)

Proportion of time series with upwards, downwards or no trend by MIME and OSPAR region

OSPAR region MIME region status CB28 CB52 CB101 CB118 CB138 CB153 CB180 total
2 Northern North Sea upward trend 0 9 0 0 0 8 0 3
no trend 67 82 91 90 83 75 70 80
downward trend 33 9 9 10 17 17 30 17
Southern North Sea upward trend 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 45 47 53 43 38 47 37 45
downward trend 53 53 47 57 62 53 63 55
Channel upward trend 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 100 100 100 100 100
downward trend 0 0 0 0 0
total upward trend 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 1
no trend 48 56 62 53 47 53 44 52
downward trend 50 42 38 47 53 45 56 47
3 Irish and Scottish West Coast upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 100 100 100 100 83 86 100 93
downward trend 0 0 0 0 17 14 0 7
Irish Sea upward trend 0 12 11 11 0 0 0 5
no trend 89 88 67 78 88 100 100 87
downward trend 11 0 22 11 12 0 0 8
total upward trend 0 9 8 9 0 0 0 3
no trend 92 91 75 83 86 94 100 89
downward trend 8 0 17 8 14 6 0 8
4 Gulf of Cadiz upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 100 100 100 100 100 89 100 98
downward trend 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 2
total upward trend 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no trend 100 100 100 100 100 89 100 98
downward trend 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 2


Status summary (numbers)

Number of time series with each status by MIME and OSPAR region

OSPAR region MIME region status CB28 CB52 CB101 CB118 CB138 CB153 CB180 total
2 Northern North Sea blue 6 1 1 1 3 3 6 21
green 9 10 15 10 13 14 10 81
red 1 6 1 6 0 0 0 14
Southern North Sea blue 6 4 1 2 1 1 2 17
green 43 45 49 24 60 56 51 328
red 3 1 2 58 0 0 1 65
Channel blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 4 11 15 3 3 45 31 112
red 21 25 26 40 1 1 3 117
total blue 12 5 2 3 4 4 8 38
green 56 66 79 37 76 115 92 521
red 25 32 29 104 1 1 4 196
3 Irish and Scottish West Coast blue 4 1 0 1 1 1 3 11
green 3 6 7 5 6 6 4 37
red 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Irish Sea blue 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
green 13 14 14 7 15 18 17 98
red 3 3 5 11 0 1 0 23
Celtic Sea blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 15
red 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
total blue 5 1 0 1 1 1 3 12
green 18 23 23 13 23 27 23 150
red 3 3 5 13 0 1 0 25
4 Iberian Coast blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 16 15 15 10 24 29 20 129
red 9 5 8 19 7 2 6 56
Gulf of Cadiz blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 15 17 16 8 15 18 12 101
red 1 0 2 8 3 0 3 17
total blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 31 32 31 18 39 47 32 230
red 10 5 10 27 10 2 9 73


Status summary (proportions)

Proportion of time series with each status by MIME and OSPAR region

OSPAR region MIME region status CB28 CB52 CB101 CB118 CB138 CB153 CB180 total
2 Northern North Sea blue 38 6 6 6 19 18 38 18
green 56 59 88 59 81 82 62 70
red 6 35 6 35 0 0 0 12
Southern North Sea blue 11 8 2 2 2 2 4 4
green 83 90 94 29 98 98 94 80
red 6 2 4 69 0 0 2 16
Channel blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 16 31 37 7 75 98 91 49
red 84 69 63 93 25 2 9 51
total blue 13 5 2 2 5 3 8 5
green 60 64 72 26 94 96 88 69
red 27 31 26 72 1 1 4 26
3 Irish and Scottish West Coast blue 57 14 0 14 14 14 43 22
green 43 86 100 72 86 86 57 76
red 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 2
Irish Sea blue 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
green 76 82 74 39 100 95 100 80
red 18 18 26 61 0 5 0 19
Celtic Sea blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 100 100 100 50 100 100 100 94
red 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 6
total blue 19 4 0 4 4 4 12 7
green 69 85 82 48 96 93 88 80
red 12 11 18 48 0 3 0 13
4 Iberian Coast blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 64 75 65 34 77 94 77 70
red 36 25 35 66 23 6 23 30
Gulf of Cadiz blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 94 100 89 50 83 100 80 86
red 6 0 11 50 17 0 20 14
total blue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
green 76 86 76 40 80 96 78 76
red 24 14 24 60 20 4 22 24


Regional assessment - methods

Tabulating the number of time series with each status category by region provides a quick summary of the individual time series results. However, it does not provide an objective regional assessment of status. Similarly, tabulating the number of time series with an upward or downward trend does not provide an objective regional assessment of trend. This section describes how the individual time series results can by synthesised in a meta-analysis to assess both status and trend at the regional level. For PCBs, the meta-analysis is conducted in two parts: an analysis of the non-planar compounds CB28, CB52, CB101, CB138, CB153, CB180 and a separate analysis of the mono-ortho CB118. The results from the two parts are then combined.

Trends

For a regional trend assessment, the trend in each time series is summarised by the estimated change in log concentration over the last twenty years (or shorter if the time series doesn’t extend that far back). Regional trends for non-planar PCBs are then estimated by fitting the following linear mixed model by restricted maximum likelihood:

  • response: trend (yearly change in log concentration)
  • fixed model: region
  • random model: PCB + region.PCB + station + trend estimation variation + residual variation

The fixed model means that a trend is estimated for each region. Trends in the different non-planar PCBs are assumed to be broadly similar, because inputs and control measures are likely to affect all non-planar PCBs in a similar way. Each regional trend can thus be interpreted as the common trend in non-planar PCB concentrations in that region (i.e. the trend averaged across all non-planar PCBs).

The random model has five terms:

  • PCB allows for variation in trend between PCBs common to all regions
  • region.PCB allows for additional variation in trend between PCBs within regions
  • station allows for variation in trend between stations common to all PCBs
  • trend estimation variation is the variance of the trend estimates from the individual time series analysis, assumed known and fixed
  • residual variation is the variation that cannot be explained by any of the fixed effects or the other random effects

The model for CB118 is simpler because there is only one compound to consider:

  • response: trend (yearly change in log concentration)
  • fixed model: region
  • random model: trend estimation variation + residual variation

The meta-analysis is restricted to time series from monitoring stations that are classified as ‘representative’ or ‘baseline’ (near pristine conditions or only subject to very diffuse inputs). ‘Impacted’ stations (those close to a point source) are omitted because trends there will likely reflect changes due to the point source and will be ‘unrepresentative’ at the regional level.

The meta-analysis is further restricted to:

  • regions with at least three trend stations with good geographic spread. Three stations is considered the minimum required to provide some sort of evidence base at the regional level
  • PCBs with trend information for at least three stations (over all regions): non-planar PCBs are treated as random effects in the meta-anlaysis, so information about trends in one PCB can be ‘borrowed’ from the trend information in the other PCBs

Status

For a regional status assessment, the status of each time series is summarised by the difference between the estimated mean log concentration in the final monitoring year and the log assessment concentration. This ensures that status is always measured on the same scale, even though the assessment concentration might vary between PCBs and regions. Essentially the same linear mixed models as for trends are then fitted. For non-planar PCBs:

  • response: status (mean log concentration - log assessment concentration)
  • fixed model: region
  • random model: PCB + region.PCB + station + status estimation variation + residual variation

and for CB118:

  • response: status (mean log concentration - log assessment concentration)
  • fixed model: region
  • random model: status estimation variation + residual variation

where status estimation variation is the variation in the status estimates from the individual time series analysis, assumed known and fixed.

There are no restrictions on the time series used in the status meta-analysis based on the classification of the monitoring station; time series from baseline, representative and impacted stations are all included. However, the few time series with a non-parametric assessment of status must be excluded, because there is no summary measure of status to use in the mixed model.

Again, the meta-analysis is restricted to regions with at least three status stations with good geographic spread and to PCBs with status information for at least three stations (over all regions).

Presentation

The results of both the trend and status regional assessments are back-transformed for presentation. The estimated regional trend is then interpreted as the percentage yearly change in concentration and the estimated regional status as the ratio of the mean regional concentration to the assessment concentration. To illustrate the latter, a value of 1 indicates that the mean regional concentration is equal to the assessment concentration; a value of 0.5 indicates that it is half the assessment concentration, and a value of 2 indicates that it is twice the assessment concentration.


Regional assessment - availability of time series

This section provides more detail on the number and geographic spread of the time series available for the meta-analyses. The tabs show the stations with parametric trend and status assessments for each OSPAR region in turn, having excluded trend assessments at impacted stations. The purple circles are stations where there is a trend assessment for at least one PCB, and the light blue cirles are stations where there are only status assessments.

The following regions have an insufficient number of time series or spread of stations and are excluded from the regional assessment:

  • trend: Channel
  • status:


OSPAR region 1


OSPAR region 2


OSPAR region 3


OSPAR region 4


Regional trends

The first 4 tabs show:

  • Regional trends: estimates of the regional trend for non-planar PCBs and CB118 with pointwise 95% confidence intervals
  • Regional trends by PCB: regional trend estimates for each PCB with pointwise 95% confidence intervals plotted by PCB
  • Regional trends by region: regional trend estimates for each PCB with pointwise 95% confidence intervals plotted by region
  • Individual time series: the trend estimates from the individual time series on which the regional assessment is based. The estimates for regions with insufficient geographic spread (and excluded from the meta-analysis) are also shown.

The symbols in all these plots have the following interpretation:

  • downward triangle: the mean concentration is significantly decreasing (p < 0.05)
  • circle: there is no significant change in mean concentration (p > 0.05)
  • upward triangle: the mean concentration is significantly increasing (p < 0.05)

The final 2 tabs show the estimates of the regional trend for non-planar PCBs and CB118 and the regional trend by PCB.


Regional trends


Regional trends by PCB


Regional trends by region


Individual time series


Estimates by region

This table shows the estimates of the regional trend:

  • trend: the estimated mean yearly change in log concentration across the region (multiplied by 100 for presentation)
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • lower, upper: the corresponding pointwise 95% confidence limits
  • % yearly change: the estimated mean % yearly change in concentration across the region
  • %yc lower, %yc upper: the corresponding pointwise 95% confidence limits


MIME region PCB trend se lower upper % yearly change %yc lower %yc upper
Northern North Sea non-planar PCBs -2.22 0.86 -3.90 -0.54 -2.20 -3.83 -0.54
CB118 -0.98 1.05 -3.04 1.08 -0.98 -3.00 1.09
Southern North Sea non-planar PCBs -3.38 0.46 -4.28 -2.49 -3.33 -4.19 -2.46
CB118 -3.43 0.34 -4.10 -2.76 -3.37 -4.02 -2.72
Irish and Scottish West Coast non-planar PCBs -2.33 1.32 -4.93 0.26 -2.30 -4.81 0.26
CB118 -1.80 2.42 -6.54 2.95 -1.78 -6.33 2.99
Irish Sea non-planar PCBs -1.29 1.05 -3.34 0.76 -1.28 -3.29 0.76
CB118 -0.65 1.04 -2.70 1.39 -0.65 -2.66 1.40
Gulf of Cadiz non-planar PCBs -6.27 1.46 -9.14 -3.41 -6.08 -8.73 -3.35
CB118 -5.46 3.59 -12.49 1.58 -5.31 -11.74 1.59


Estimates by region and PCB

This table shows the estimates of the regional trend by determinand:

  • trend: the estimated mean yearly change in log concentration across the region (multiplied by 100 for presentation)
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • lower, upper: the corresponding pointwise 95% confidence limits
  • % yearly change: the estimated mean % yearly change in concentration across the region
  • %yc lower, %yc upper: the corresponding pointwise 95% confidence limits


MIME region PCB trend se lower upper % yearly change %yc lower %yc upper
Northern North Sea CB28 -1.73 0.89 -3.47 0.02 -1.71 -3.41 0.02
CB52 -2.15 0.91 -3.93 -0.37 -2.13 -3.85 -0.37
CB101 -2.08 0.89 -3.81 -0.34 -2.06 -3.74 -0.34
CB118 -0.98 1.05 -3.04 1.08 -0.98 -3.00 1.09
CB138 -2.62 0.87 -4.33 -0.92 -2.59 -4.23 -0.92
CB153 -1.65 0.86 -3.33 0.03 -1.64 -3.28 0.03
CB180 -3.10 0.88 -4.82 -1.39 -3.06 -4.71 -1.38
Southern North Sea CB28 -2.85 0.42 -3.69 -2.02 -2.81 -3.62 -2.00
CB52 -3.39 0.44 -4.25 -2.54 -3.34 -4.16 -2.51
CB101 -2.92 0.42 -3.73 -2.10 -2.87 -3.66 -2.08
CB118 -3.43 0.34 -4.10 -2.76 -3.37 -4.02 -2.72
CB138 -3.67 0.41 -4.47 -2.86 -3.60 -4.37 -2.82
CB153 -2.94 0.41 -3.75 -2.13 -2.89 -3.68 -2.10
CB180 -4.53 0.44 -5.40 -3.67 -4.43 -5.26 -3.60
Irish and Scottish West Coast CB28 -1.82 1.36 -4.48 0.84 -1.80 -4.39 0.85
CB52 -2.28 1.36 -4.96 0.39 -2.26 -4.83 0.39
CB101 -2.11 1.36 -4.77 0.55 -2.09 -4.66 0.56
CB118 -1.80 2.42 -6.54 2.95 -1.78 -6.33 2.99
CB138 -2.65 1.32 -5.24 -0.06 -2.61 -5.10 -0.06
CB153 -1.90 1.32 -4.48 0.69 -1.88 -4.39 0.69
CB180 -3.23 1.35 -5.88 -0.58 -3.18 -5.71 -0.58
Irish Sea CB28 -0.76 1.06 -2.84 1.32 -0.76 -2.80 1.33
CB52 -1.15 1.09 -3.28 0.98 -1.15 -3.23 0.98
CB101 -1.12 1.07 -3.22 0.97 -1.12 -3.16 0.98
CB118 -0.65 1.04 -2.70 1.39 -0.65 -2.66 1.40
CB138 -1.70 1.06 -3.78 0.38 -1.68 -3.71 0.38
CB153 -0.85 1.06 -2.92 1.22 -0.85 -2.88 1.23
CB180 -2.17 1.07 -4.26 -0.07 -2.14 -4.17 -0.07
Gulf of Cadiz CB28 -5.72 1.48 -8.62 -2.82 -5.56 -8.26 -2.78
CB52 -6.24 1.49 -9.16 -3.32 -6.05 -8.75 -3.27
CB101 -6.06 1.49 -8.98 -3.15 -5.88 -8.59 -3.10
CB118 -5.46 3.59 -12.49 1.58 -5.31 -11.74 1.59
CB138 -6.62 1.48 -9.52 -3.71 -6.40 -9.08 -3.64
CB153 -5.83 1.46 -8.70 -2.96 -5.66 -8.33 -2.92
CB180 -7.17 1.49 -10.09 -4.25 -6.92 -9.60 -4.16


Regional status compared to the Environmental Assessment Criterion (EAC)

The first 4 tabs show:

  • Regional status: estimates of the regional status for non-planar PCBs and CB118 with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals
  • Regional status by PCB: regional status estimates for each PCB with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals plotted by PCB
  • Regional status by region: regional status estimates for each PCB with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals plotted by region
  • Individual time series: the status estimates from the individual time series on which the regional assessment is based. The estimates for regions with insufficient geographic spread (and excluded from the meta-analysis) are also shown.

The symbols in all the plots have the following interpretation:

  • blue: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)
  • green: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the EAC
  • red: the mean concentration is not significantly below the EAC

Note that to see why some points might be coloured blue, it is necessary to look ahead to the next section, where status is compared to the BAC. Unfortunately, it isn’t easy to present the assessment of status relative to the EAC with the assessment of status relative to the BAC because the ratio of the BAC to the EAC can vary between PCBs and regions.

The final 2 tabs shows the estimates of the regional status for non-planar PCBs and CB118 and the regional status by PCB.


Regional status


Regional status by PCB


Regional status by region


Individual time series


Estimates by region

This table shows the estimates of the regional status:

  • status: the estimated mean log concentration minus the log EAC
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit
  • concentration: the estimated mean concentration relative to the EAC
  • conc upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit


MIME region PCB status se upper concentration conc upper
Northern North Sea non-planar PCBs -3.66 0.46 -2.91 0.03 0.05
CB118 -1.23 0.25 -0.81 0.29 0.44
Southern North Sea non-planar PCBs -2.75 0.40 -2.10 0.06 0.12
CB118 -0.77 0.10 -0.60 0.46 0.55
Channel non-planar PCBs -2.15 0.41 -1.48 0.12 0.23
CB118 0.53 0.14 0.76 1.71 2.14
Irish and Scottish West Coast non-planar PCBs -4.12 0.54 -3.23 0.02 0.04
CB118 -1.84 0.41 -1.16 0.16 0.31
Irish Sea non-planar PCBs -2.74 0.45 -2.00 0.06 0.14
CB118 -0.46 0.24 -0.07 0.63 0.93
Celtic Sea non-planar PCBs -3.22 0.70 -2.06 0.04 0.13
CB118 -0.78 0.63 0.26 0.46 1.30
Iberian Coast non-planar PCBs -3.57 0.42 -2.88 0.03 0.06
CB118 -1.23 0.18 -0.93 0.29 0.40
Gulf of Cadiz non-planar PCBs -4.49 0.45 -3.75 0.01 0.02
CB118 -2.31 0.30 -1.82 0.10 0.16


Estimates by region and PCB

This table shows the estimates of the regional trend by determinand:

  • status: the estimated mean log concentration minus the log EAC
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit
  • concentration: the estimated mean concentration relative to the EAC
  • conc upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit


MIME region PCB status se upper concentration conc upper
Northern North Sea CB28 -2.58 0.28 -2.12 0.08 0.12
CB52 -2.83 0.29 -2.36 0.06 0.09
CB101 -2.85 0.28 -2.38 0.06 0.09
CB118 -1.23 0.25 -0.81 0.29 0.44
CB138 -3.73 0.28 -3.27 0.02 0.04
CB153 -5.08 0.27 -4.63 0.01 0.01
CB180 -4.90 0.28 -4.45 0.01 0.01
Southern North Sea CB28 -1.78 0.14 -1.55 0.17 0.21
CB52 -2.62 0.14 -2.39 0.07 0.09
CB101 -1.90 0.14 -1.68 0.15 0.19
CB118 -0.77 0.10 -0.60 0.46 0.55
CB138 -2.59 0.13 -2.37 0.07 0.09
CB153 -3.86 0.14 -3.64 0.02 0.03
CB180 -3.75 0.14 -3.52 0.02 0.03
Channel CB28 -1.53 0.17 -1.25 0.22 0.29
CB52 -1.91 0.17 -1.63 0.15 0.20
CB101 -1.28 0.16 -1.01 0.28 0.36
CB118 0.53 0.14 0.76 1.71 2.14
CB138 -1.79 0.29 -1.31 0.17 0.27
CB153 -3.24 0.16 -2.99 0.04 0.05
CB180 -3.15 0.16 -2.88 0.04 0.06
Irish and Scottish West Coast CB28 -3.06 0.42 -2.37 0.05 0.09
CB52 -3.41 0.43 -2.71 0.03 0.07
CB101 -3.41 0.45 -2.67 0.03 0.07
CB118 -1.84 0.41 -1.16 0.16 0.31
CB138 -4.12 0.40 -3.45 0.02 0.03
CB153 -5.54 0.41 -4.87 0.00 0.01
CB180 -5.19 0.41 -4.52 0.01 0.01
Irish Sea CB28 -1.56 0.27 -1.12 0.21 0.33
CB52 -2.07 0.28 -1.62 0.13 0.20
CB101 -2.22 0.28 -1.76 0.11 0.17
CB118 -0.46 0.24 -0.07 0.63 0.93
CB138 -2.74 0.27 -2.30 0.06 0.10
CB153 -4.19 0.27 -3.75 0.02 0.02
CB180 -3.69 0.27 -3.23 0.03 0.04
Celtic Sea CB28 -1.95 0.63 -0.92 0.14 0.40
CB52 -2.75 0.63 -1.72 0.06 0.18
CB101 -2.71 0.63 -1.67 0.07 0.19
CB118 -0.78 0.63 0.26 0.46 1.30
CB138 -3.14 0.63 -2.11 0.04 0.12
CB153 -4.64 0.61 -3.64 0.01 0.03
CB180 -4.12 0.63 -3.08 0.02 0.05
Iberian Coast CB28 -2.71 0.20 -2.38 0.07 0.09
CB52 -3.78 0.21 -3.44 0.02 0.03
CB101 -3.34 0.20 -3.00 0.04 0.05
CB118 -1.23 0.18 -0.93 0.29 0.40
CB138 -3.18 0.20 -2.85 0.04 0.06
CB153 -4.69 0.20 -4.37 0.01 0.01
CB180 -3.73 0.20 -3.40 0.02 0.03
Gulf of Cadiz CB28 -4.06 0.28 -3.61 0.02 0.03
CB52 -4.38 0.28 -3.92 0.01 0.02
CB101 -3.97 0.29 -3.50 0.02 0.03
CB118 -2.31 0.30 -1.82 0.10 0.16
CB138 -4.12 0.28 -3.66 0.02 0.03
CB153 -5.46 0.27 -5.01 0.00 0.01
CB180 -4.97 0.30 -4.48 0.01 0.01


Regional status compared to the Background Assessment Concentration (BAC)

The first 4 tabs show:

  • Regional status: estimates of the regional status for non-planar PCBs and CB118 with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals
  • Regional status by PCB: regional status estimates for each PCB with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals plotted by PCB
  • Regional status by region: regional status estimates for each PCB with pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence intervals plotted by region
  • Individual time series: the status estimates from the individual time series on which the regional assessment is based. The estimates for regions with insufficient geographic spread (and excluded from the meta-analysis) are also shown.

The symbols in all the plots have the following interpretation:

  • blue: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the BAC
  • green: the mean concentration is significantly (p < 0.05) below the Environmental Assessment Criterion (EAC)
  • red: the mean concentration is not significantly below the EAC

The final 2 tabs shows the estimates of the regional status for non-planar PCBs and CB118 and the regional status by PCB.


Regional status


Regional status by PCB


Regional status by region


Individual time series


Estimates by region

This table shows the estimates of the regional status:

  • status: the estimated mean log concentration minus the log BAC
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit
  • concentration: the estimated mean concentration relative to the BAC
  • conc upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit


MIME region PCB status se upper concentration conc upper
Northern North Sea non-planar PCBs 0.06 0.27 0.51 1.06 1.67
CB118 0.04 0.24 0.43 1.04 1.54
Southern North Sea non-planar PCBs 0.97 0.20 1.30 2.65 3.66
CB118 0.50 0.10 0.66 1.65 1.93
Channel non-planar PCBs 1.58 0.21 1.92 4.86 6.85
CB118 1.80 0.13 2.02 6.07 7.54
Irish and Scottish West Coast non-planar PCBs -0.39 0.36 0.21 0.67 1.23
CB118 -0.57 0.39 0.07 0.56 1.07
Irish Sea non-planar PCBs 0.99 0.27 1.43 2.68 4.19
CB118 0.81 0.23 1.18 2.25 3.25
Celtic Sea non-planar PCBs 0.50 0.52 1.37 1.66 3.92
CB118 0.48 0.60 1.47 1.62 4.36
Iberian Coast non-planar PCBs
CB118
Gulf of Cadiz non-planar PCBs
CB118


Estimates by region and PCB

This table shows the estimates of the regional trend by determinand:

  • status: the estimated mean log concentration minus the log BAC
  • se: the corresponding standard error
  • upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit
  • concentration: the estimated mean concentration relative to the BAC
  • conc upper: the corresponding pointwise upper one-sided 95% confidence limit


MIME region PCB status se upper concentration conc upper
Northern North Sea CB28 -0.52 0.24 -0.12 0.60 0.88
CB52 0.27 0.25 0.68 1.31 1.97
CB101 0.23 0.24 0.63 1.25 1.87
CB118 0.04 0.24 0.43 1.04 1.54
CB138 0.23 0.24 0.62 1.26 1.86
CB153 0.27 0.23 0.65 1.30 1.91
CB180 -0.11 0.24 0.28 0.89 1.32
Southern North Sea CB28 0.28 0.12 0.47 1.32 1.60
CB52 0.52 0.12 0.71 1.67 2.04
CB101 1.16 0.12 1.36 3.20 3.88
CB118 0.50 0.10 0.66 1.65 1.93
CB138 1.37 0.11 1.55 3.92 4.73
CB153 1.48 0.12 1.67 4.41 5.33
CB180 1.04 0.12 1.23 2.82 3.43
Channel CB28 0.60 0.15 0.85 1.83 2.34
CB52 1.28 0.15 1.52 3.58 4.56
CB101 1.82 0.14 2.05 6.16 7.75
CB118 1.80 0.13 2.02 6.07 7.54
CB138 2.00 0.24 2.39 7.38 10.96
CB153 2.12 0.13 2.34 8.34 10.38
CB180 1.66 0.14 1.89 5.28 6.65
Irish and Scottish West Coast CB28 -0.97 0.36 -0.38 0.38 0.68
CB52 -0.31 0.36 0.29 0.74 1.34
CB101 -0.29 0.38 0.33 0.75 1.39
CB118 -0.57 0.39 0.07 0.56 1.07
CB138 -0.17 0.34 0.40 0.85 1.49
CB153 -0.19 0.35 0.38 0.82 1.46
CB180 -0.43 0.35 0.14 0.65 1.15
Irish Sea CB28 0.49 0.23 0.87 1.63 2.39
CB52 1.05 0.24 1.44 2.86 4.23
CB101 0.89 0.24 1.28 2.44 3.61
CB118 0.81 0.23 1.18 2.25 3.25
CB138 1.22 0.23 1.60 3.40 4.98
CB153 1.17 0.23 1.55 3.22 4.69
CB180 1.08 0.24 1.47 2.95 4.35
Celtic Sea CB28 0.08 0.53 0.95 1.08 2.58
CB52 0.44 0.52 1.30 1.55 3.67
CB101 0.48 0.53 1.35 1.61 3.86
CB118 0.48 0.60 1.47 1.62 4.36
CB138 0.78 0.53 1.64 2.17 5.16
CB153 0.71 0.51 1.55 2.03 4.70
CB180 0.55 0.53 1.42 1.73 4.15
Iberian Coast CB28
CB52
CB101
CB118
CB138
CB153
CB180
Gulf of Cadiz CB28
CB52
CB101
CB118
CB138
CB153
CB180


PCB profiles

The profile of concentrations across PCBs can sometimes be useful for examining sources, and for comparing concentrations across regions where assessment criteria are not available. Profiles were examined by fitting the following linear mixed model to the non-planar PCBs by restricted maximum likelihood:

  • response: mean log concentration
  • fixed model: region
  • random model: PCB + region.PCB + station + estimation variation + residual variation

where, for each time series, the mean log concentration is the estimated mean log concentration in the final monitoring year and the estimation variance is the variance associated with this estimate. The usual simplified model was also fitted to CB118 and the results combined.

The estimated PCB concentration profiles by region are shown below with pointwise 95% confidence limits. The units are ug/kg dw normalised to 2.5% organic carbon (apart from in the Iberian Coast and Gulf of Cadiz where they are non-normalised).